Mai Titi excludes Auxillia as she announces self with ED as Mother’s Day special Clip

COZY: President Mnangagwa and Mai TT


In a move that has stirred significant controversy and public discourse, Zimbabwean socialite Felistas Murata, commonly known as Mai Titi, released a Mother’s Day video that conspicuously excludes any mention or visual representation of First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa. Instead, the video prominently features Murata in a couple’s setting with President Emmerson Mnangagwa, extending warm Mother’s Day wishes and expressions of affection towards the President.

The video, shared widely across social media platforms, depicts Mai Titi (who is still to comment over the matter) adorned in a manner suggestive of a spousal relationship with President Mnangagwa, under the caption: “A special Mother’s day well spent with His Excellency Dr. ED Mnangagwa. We love you President. ED pfeeeee.” This portrayal and the overt omission of the First Lady raise profound questions about respect, decorum, and the underlying tensions within Zimbabwe’s political and social spheres.

The Context of Disrespect

This incident does not occur in isolation. Over the past six years, several allegations have surfaced, involving various women claiming intimate relationships with President Mnangagwa. Among these women is Susan Mutami, who is notably an age mate of Felistas Murata. Such claims, whether substantiated or not, invariably cast shadows over the First Family’s public image and personal dynamics.

Political analyst Tendai Marima comments on the issue, stating, “The exclusion of First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa in a public Mother’s Day message, traditionally a day for honoring all mothers, including the nation’s ‘First Mother,’ can be seen as a significant oversight at best, and a deliberate act of disrespect at worst. It sends a confusing signal about the unity and stability within the First Family.”

Implications for the Mnangagwa Presidency

The portrayal of Mai Titi in a quasi-spousal role with the President on such a public platform does not merely stir the pot of celebrity gossip but resonates deeper, potentially impacting the public perception of the presidency. The personal is invariably political, especially in the tightly knit fabric of Zimbabwean political life, where personal actions often have public and political ramifications.

“The optics of such a video can be damaging in several ways,” notes political commentator Brian Raftopoulos. “It undermines the position of the First Lady, distracts from national issues, and affects the public and international perception of the presidency.”

The Controversial Slogan: “ED Pfee” and Its Inappropriate Sexual Connotations

The slogan “ED Pfee,” popularized by the ruling ZANU PF party and used by Felistas Murata in her Mother’s Day video, has been a topic of considerable debate and controversy in Zimbabwean society. Initially intended as a rallying cry for the political campaign of President Emmerson Mnangagwa, it has, over time, taken on a dual meaning that includes inappropriate sexual connotations. This alternate interpretation has contributed to undermining the public respect for political discourse in Zimbabwe.

The term “Pfee,” which loosely translates to “enter” or “penetrate” in the Shona language, has been adopted by the ruling party’s supporters in various contexts. While meant to symbolize the party’s determination to forge ahead with its agenda, the term has also been linked to “bedroom level immorality,” a phrase that has circulated widely in political and social discussions.

Cultural and Political Ramifications

The usage of such a slogan in a political context, especially when associated with the President, opens up a complex dialogue about the intertwining of political messaging and cultural interpretations. “The term ‘ED Pfee’ may have started as a harmless campaign slogan, but its evolving connotations have brought about a troubling layer of sexual innuendo that is hard to ignore,” explains sociologist Dr. Farai Mutondoro. “This kind of language, when meshed with political campaigns, tends to diminish the seriousness of the political messages and instead, shifts the focus to moral and ethical concerns.”

Critics argue that the sexual undertones associated with “ED Pfee” are indicative of a broader disrespect for women within political rhetoric, reinforcing gender stereotypes and trivializing the significant contributions of women in leadership roles, such as that of the First Lady.

Public and International Perception

The inappropriate use of this slogan not only affects domestic audiences but also how Zimbabwe is perceived on an international stage. “When political discourse stoops to such levels, it reflects poorly on the nation’s leadership and governance standards to the international community,” states political analyst Michael Mhlanga. “It undermines efforts to present Zimbabwe as a mature democracy.”

Call for Higher Standards in Political Communication

There is a growing call among civil society and political commentators for higher standards of decorum in political communication. Advocates for gender respect and equality emphasize the need to scrutinize and possibly revise the slogans and language used in political campaigns to ensure they uphold the dignity of all citizens and do not perpetuate any form of disrespect or inequality.

“As Zimbabwe continues on its path of political evolution, the language used by our leaders and their supporters must reflect the values of respect, integrity, and equality,” urges human rights advocate Linda Masarira. “The political arena should not be a place for hidden agendas or inappropriate insinuations, which can only serve to divide rather than unite the nation.”

While “ED Pfee” continues to be a slogan for the ruling party, its implications and the broader meanings it has acquired demand a critical examination and thoughtful consideration to align political expressions with the ethical and cultural values of Zimbabwean society.

While the intent behind the video may be subject to interpretation, the outcome is unequivocally clear: it has sparked a debate on respect, propriety, and the personal judgments of public figures. For a nation that deeply values its cultural norms and respect for leaders, such actions, whether by design or accident, challenge these very principles.

“As leaders, there’s a responsibility to maintain decorum and respect, both publicly and privately,” asserts human rights advocate Linda Masarira in a previous matter. “This incident isn’t just about personal relationships; it’s about the image and integrity of our national leadership.”

Moving forward, it will be essential for Zimbabwe’s leadership to address these perceptions, not just within the confines of their personal lives but as a matter of national image and international respectability.

About Post Author


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *